Future1 is a service engagement, not a per-seat software licence. We do not publish a price grid because the honest answer depends on scope. What we can publish is exactly how the number is built, so you can plan a budget before you talk to us.
One pathway in one high school is a different operation from nine pathways across five campuses. This is the single largest driver.
Depth of coordination
Whether Future1 owns employer recruitment and placement coordination, or supports a team that already does it.
Placement volume
Tours and speakers scale cheaply. Internships and apprenticeships require per-student coordination and follow-up.
Reporting requirements
Standard outcome reporting is included. Custom board formats, state submissions, or data integrations add scope.
Regional complexity
A multi-district or chamber-coordinated region needs a coordination layer a single district does not.
Engagement length
Longer commitments cost less per year because relationship work compounds instead of restarting.
Funding
Where districts typically fund this from
We are not your compliance authority. Confirm allowability with your business office and state CTE contact; we will supply the scope documentation they ask for.
Perkins V local funds
Work-based learning coordination and employer engagement are common local uses of funds where the state plan and your needs assessment support it.
CTE and district general funds
Where the engagement replaces or postpones a full-time coordinator position, districts often compare the two directly.
State workforce and grant programs
Many states fund regional work-based learning expansion. These vary widely and are worth checking before you assume a budget source.
Regional and philanthropic partners
Chambers, economic development organizations, and local foundations sometimes co-fund the regional coordination layer.
Pilot
A structured way to start small
1
Choose one pathway
We pick a single pathway or school where employer coverage is thin and leadership attention is real.
Before start
2
Agree the success criteria in writing
Employers recruited, opportunities delivered, placements coordinated, follow-up completion. Named numbers, agreed before we begin.
Week 1
3
Run a defined term
A semester or school year with the full system in place: mapping, outreach, coordination, confirmed handoffs, follow-up.
One term
4
Review and decide
An honest read against the criteria. Expand, adjust, or stop. A pilot that did not work should end, and we will say so first.
End of term
Proposal
What you receive after a scoping call
A written scope: schools, pathways, and what Future1 owns versus what your team owns
The engagement model recommended, and why the other two were not
A fixed annual figure with the assumptions it depends on stated openly
Success criteria and the reporting cadence attached to them
An implementation timeline with 30, 60, and 90 day expectations
Data handling terms and what your district owns at exit
Questions
The questions districts actually ask
Straight answers, including where the honest answer is 'it depends'.
Get a scoped number.
One conversation about your pathways and staffing is enough for us to put a written figure in front of you.