Investment

What this costs, and what drives the number.

Future1 is a service engagement, not a per-seat software licence. We do not publish a price grid because the honest answer depends on scope. What we can publish is exactly how the number is built, so you can plan a budget before you talk to us.

Engagement models

Three ways districts work with us.

Same methodology, different amount of the work carried by Future1.

Employer Partnership Office

We operate as your external partnership team on a multi-year engagement. The highest investment and the highest transfer of work away from your staff.

  • Multi-year, ongoing
  • Future1 carries recruitment, coordination, and follow-up
  • Scoped by schools, pathways, and placement volume

Employer Partnership Hub

You keep delivery in-house and use the system, structure, and reporting layer. Lower investment, higher internal staffing requirement.

  • Annual engagement
  • Your team runs outreach and coordination
  • Scoped by users, schools, and reporting needs

Advisory

Strategy, design, and standing review while your team executes. The smallest engagement and the right one when you already have staff capacity.

  • Defined term, typically a school year
  • Design, cadence, and improvement reviews
  • Scoped by scope of review and meeting cadence

Not sure which applies? Compare all solutions.

Cost drivers

What moves the number up or down

Scope of schools and pathways

One pathway in one high school is a different operation from nine pathways across five campuses. This is the single largest driver.

Depth of coordination

Whether Future1 owns employer recruitment and placement coordination, or supports a team that already does it.

Placement volume

Tours and speakers scale cheaply. Internships and apprenticeships require per-student coordination and follow-up.

Reporting requirements

Standard outcome reporting is included. Custom board formats, state submissions, or data integrations add scope.

Regional complexity

A multi-district or chamber-coordinated region needs a coordination layer a single district does not.

Engagement length

Longer commitments cost less per year because relationship work compounds instead of restarting.

Funding

Where districts typically fund this from

We are not your compliance authority. Confirm allowability with your business office and state CTE contact; we will supply the scope documentation they ask for.

Perkins V local funds

Work-based learning coordination and employer engagement are common local uses of funds where the state plan and your needs assessment support it.

CTE and district general funds

Where the engagement replaces or postpones a full-time coordinator position, districts often compare the two directly.

State workforce and grant programs

Many states fund regional work-based learning expansion. These vary widely and are worth checking before you assume a budget source.

Regional and philanthropic partners

Chambers, economic development organizations, and local foundations sometimes co-fund the regional coordination layer.

Pilot

A structured way to start small

  1. Choose one pathway

    We pick a single pathway or school where employer coverage is thin and leadership attention is real.

    Before start

  2. Agree the success criteria in writing

    Employers recruited, opportunities delivered, placements coordinated, follow-up completion. Named numbers, agreed before we begin.

    Week 1

  3. Run a defined term

    A semester or school year with the full system in place: mapping, outreach, coordination, confirmed handoffs, follow-up.

    One term

  4. Review and decide

    An honest read against the criteria. Expand, adjust, or stop. A pilot that did not work should end, and we will say so first.

    End of term

Proposal

What you receive after a scoping call

  • A written scope: schools, pathways, and what Future1 owns versus what your team owns
  • The engagement model recommended, and why the other two were not
  • A fixed annual figure with the assumptions it depends on stated openly
  • Success criteria and the reporting cadence attached to them
  • An implementation timeline with 30, 60, and 90 day expectations
  • Data handling terms and what your district owns at exit

Questions

The questions districts actually ask

Straight answers, including where the honest answer is 'it depends'.

Get a scoped number.

One conversation about your pathways and staffing is enough for us to put a written figure in front of you.